Academic network of European disability experts (ANED)
  • Go to Logo Human European Consultancy
  • Centre for Disability Studies University of Leeds

The development and application of indicators of experiences of disabled people

ANED annual meeting 2012 data and indicators

During the ANED annual meeting, held in Brussels on 14 December 2012, presentations were made by Professor Stefanos Grammenos, member of the ANED core research team and Martha Sticking from the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.

Professor Stefanos Grammenos (Centre for European Social and Economic Policy) presented an update on comparative data against key quantitative indicators relevant to the EU2020 strategy. These relate primarily to the headline targets agreed for employment, education and poverty reduction. Additional indicator data was presented on reported accessibility items.

New statistical indicators

A new report is now available summarizing ANED’s work on the development of Indicators for Disability Equality in Europe (IDEE), written by Prof Stefanos Grammenos. Based on the earlier proposals, developed by Mark Priestley and Anna Lawson, 11 headline indicators were selected for 2011. The focus items relate to key targets on employment, education and poverty in the Europe 2020 Strategy, and to the theme of accessibility in the European Disability Strategy 2010-2020. Secondary data analysis was conducted using the EU-SILC survey for 2008 and 2009, with additional statistics drawn from Eurostat’s internet database. This includes data for all EU27 Member States for people aged 16 and over living in private households. The items selected included: employment rates, unemployment rates, economic activity rates; early leavers from education and training, completion of tertiary or equivalent education, risk of poverty and social inclusion (including households with low work intensity, and risk of poverty after social transfers, severe material deprivation). These indicators were further analysed by gender, age group and change over time since 2008, where possible. New items were piloted on the accessibility of public transport, and accessibility of postal or banking services.

Piloting the indicators

Following the conceptualisation and development of indicator proposals in 2008 and 2009, the next stage was to pilot a selection of statistical items using available data at the European level. The initial list was selected to include items particularly relevant to the EU2020 targets on outcomes in employment, tertiary education and poverty reduction but also sought to include items across the range of themes proposed by the working group. Relevant data was accessed via Eurostat and from published sources to populate the selected items. The compilation of statistical indicators from the pilot is now available as a report and an annex of tables.

Comparative data on equality and accessibility for disabled people in European countries

Policy makers will require new kinds of data to monitor implementation of the UN Convention and the European Disability Action Plan priorities. ANED aims to increase understanding about comparative data that can be used for disability research and policy development in Europe. Disability should be mainstreamed in data collection and access to such data should be widely available. During 2008 we examined existing sources of comparative data and produced an annotated report on relevant European social surveys and statistical data sources.

Indicators of Disability Equality in Europe (IDEE)

During 2009 a working group was formed to develop preliminary proposals for qualitative and quantitative indicators, in consultation with the ANED Network and other relevant actors engaged in indicator development work, including Eurostat, the World Health Organisation and the Council of Europe. The purpose of the group was to agree an outline approach to developing comparative indicators and to produce recommendations for a preliminary list that could be proposed for wider consultation and piloting.

Reports on comparative data

Comparative Data and Monitoring

Professor Stefanos Grammenos (Centre for European Social and Economic Policy) presented an update on the piloting of key quantitative indicators relevant to the EU 2020 strategy.

Pan-European statistical databases, such as EU-SILC, provided the data for comparing participation and outcomes for disabled women and men in the EU Member Statesin a range of areas, including: demographics; employment, unemployment and economic activity rates; risk of povertyand severe material deprivation; accessibility of public transport, postal and banking services; completion of tertiary education. 

Pilot: Comparative Data and Monitoring

During ANED’s third Annual Meeting on 1st December 2010 Professor Stefanos Grammenos (Centre for European Social and Economic Policy) presented a summary report of key findings from the pilot of a range of quantitative indicators, previously proposed by ANED, including those most relevant to the EU2020 strategy.

Feasibility of measuring disability equality in relation to the UN Convention

During the ANED 2009 Annual Meeting, Professor Stefanos Grammenos (Centre For European Social And Economic Policy) presented key findings from his draft synthesis report on the feasibility of measuring the proposed disability indicator set using existing data sources (Report published beginning of 2010).

Opportunities for national comparisons of data on the situation of disabled people

Wim van Oorschot presenting at meeting












During the 2008 ANED Annual Meeting Wim van Oorschot (Tilburg University) provided an introduction to the availability of comparative disability data. His task was to identify the opportunities for national comparisons between European countries regarding quantitative data on the situation of disabled people, through an annotated review of existing relevant data sources.
Go to the European Commission - Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities This initiative is financed by the EC Programme Progress. But the views expressed in this website do not necessarily reflect the official views of the EU institutions.